The other side of Michael Moore

edited May 2007 in conversations
Even before its opening in Canada tomorrow, Hot Docs, the largest documentary film festival in North America, can be assured of at least one controversial film - one that aims to debunk Michael Moore.

Manufacturing Dissent, about the life and work of the Oscar and Palme d'Or winning filmmaker of hits such as Bowling for Columbine and Fahrenheit 911, shows him twisting the truth and using footage out of context. The film, which will be shown on Sunday and Tuesday, caused a stir at the South by Southwest film and music festival in Austin, Texas, in March.

Criticism of Moore's films has been loud and constant - but it has come mainly from the right, not from his own ideological camp. "We agreed with his politics," said Rick Caine, who made the film with his partner, Debbie Melnyk. And no one has done more for documentary films, he adds.

"Roger and Me was hilarious, and we cheered Michael Moore when he criticised the war in Iraq at the 2003 Oscars, when few people did," said Caine. Caine and Melnyk, who are married, had just finished a film about tycoon Conrad Black.

"We wanted to do a film about someone we liked, someone we wanted to celebrate," he said. But they soon discovered a trail of broken promises to colleagues, exaggerations of facts, and footage used out of context. They considered abandoning the film, but had already accepted funding so they continued, attempting to get some on-camera answers in the same way Moore did in Roger and Me with then-General Motors chairman Rogers Smith.

Although the film is based on Smith's refusal to speak to Moore, the two met twice, says former friend and activist Jim Musselman in Manufacturing Dissent. Musselman, a lawyer who has worked with US activist Ralph Nader to promote the use of air bags in cars, was a friend and fellow activist with Moore in unemployment plagued Flint, Michigan.

The film shows an embittered Musselman claiming that Moore had asked him to lie about the meetings with Smith. Other colleagues, including actress Jeanine Garafalo, praise him for his kindness and showmanship, and for being uncompromising in his criticism.

"I believe Moore really did care about Flint, that he was coming from a pure place," remarked Caine. But it was much more dramatic to have Roger refusing to meet with him," he said. This film, Caine added, taught him more about documentary ethics than any of his preceding five films. Another telling moment for the team was in Bowling for Columbine, when Moore, praising Canada, claims that the country is so safe that Canadians do not have to lock their doors.

"I lock my door, so does everyone I know," Caine remarked, adding that 25 per cent of his North American ticket sales come from Canada. The film turns into a kind of Michael and Me with filmmaker Debbie Melnyk appearing at Moore's speaking engagements and trying to get an interview. In the film Moore looks surprised, insists he likes Canadians - he even hugs a blushing Melnyk at one point - but claims he is too busy for a formal interview. He tells her to email him, but her requests were never answered.

At a Moore appearance at Kent State University in Ohio, which the filmmakers entered with fabricated TV-station identification, Moore's sister, Anne, knocks down Caine's camera and they are told to leave. Caine and his partner are aware that the film could be used by the right-wing media to discredit Moore's political convictions.

"On Fox TV we said that if you're going to talk about misleading the people, you have to say that (US President) George Bush misled the country into going to war with Iraq."

The Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Film Festival opens tomorrow and will present 130 films in 10 days.

mh.com.au





more on YouTube

Comments

  • edited 12:10AM
    There was an interview with the film makers on JJJ (Oz radio station) a few weeks ago. Sounds very interesting.

    Poor buggers, they try and make film celebrating him and end up doing the opposite.
  • edited 12:10AM
    That second video was hilarious

    "If people are willing to lie for the cause, like a major news organization for instance..."

    I think he just stuck it to fox, on fox! NICE!
  • edited 12:10AM
    I respect his right to have varied politics, but the guy's just a douche- you can't call his films documentaries- they're just as slanted as Fox is.
  • edited 12:10AM
    Everyone is slanted to one way or another, the thing that bothers me about Moore(and Fox News) is that he pretends not to be
  • ihcihc
    edited 12:10AM
    they aren't investigative journalism they are a polemic
  • edited 12:10AM
    orsonrockwell:Everyone is slanted to one way or another, the thing that bothers me about Moore(and Fox News) is that he pretends not to be
  • edited May 2007
    for the most part there really isn't any 'indifferent' journalism anymore, most writers already have a directive, and slanted view on their take and usually follow
    the path that they have already laid out inside their minds...
  • edited May 2007
    ~for the record I thought Bowling, and Fahrenheit were both good movies, but i DON'T take everything i am told/read/see/ or hear as the gospel, to me its just a whole bunch of "things that make you go hmmmmm"~ then i look into it. I am not anti Michael Moore, im just not praising his bandwagon. I read the paper everyday, and usually start out with the editorial section, maybe im just so used to argumentative discourse that i'm slightly numb to it all, but from watching them on fox, and listening to what they stand for, i dont think these people set out to make him look bad, they just followed their conscience and did what they set out to do~Which was make a movie about Michael Moore...I mean these arent a bunch of Right Wing CEOs with an agenda, they are liberals that are calling bullshit. I wouldn't call them polemic...myopic maybe(as it may hurt the cause they believe in)...regardless~I'm all for it, im sick of all the bullshit coming from both sides
  • edited 12:10AM
    Biff:I respect his right to have varied politics, but the guy's just a douche- you can't call his films documentaries- they're just as slanted as Fox is.
    I think the problem is that we, as everyday people, want one source to trust, like one RSS link we can hold to be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth that we can put our faith in to steer us right. The current climate in media doesn't allow for that. We can't put our faith on one anchor person or channel or even a newspaper anymore. I think we need to absorb a balance of information from all sides to make our own individual informed opinion because we can't be upset with someone else's opinions. In their eyes I'm sure they think they are being truthful, objective and moderate.
  • edited 12:10AM
    yeh michael moore is a tool and fox news got bummed in their own interview

    brilliant
Sign In or Register to comment.