The perils of getting naked with Sagmeister

edited June 2012 in creations
http://www.creativereview.co.uk/cr-blog/2012/june/getting-naked-with-sagmeister ~ Posted by Patrick Burgoyne

When Sagmeister Inc chose to announce that it had become Sagmeister & Walsh, it must have seemed like a fun and appropriate idea to update the studio's original naked mailer with a new nude shot featuring both partners together. But will the decision have as positive an effect on the career of Jessica Walsh as it did on that of the studio's founder?

image

Stefan Sagmeister has always understood the power of getting naked. He first made his mark with a poster for the Hong Kong chapter of the 4As advertising organisation featuring four bare backsides (shown above, 1992). It was a funny, clever, daring idea which generated both attention and controversy - values that have propelled Sagmeister's career ever since.

image

Witness also the 1999 poster for an AIGA lecture in Cranbrook for which Sagmeister had the event's details carved into his naked torso. Or his Sagmeister On A Binge poster for a show in Japan featuring the before and after effects of junk food on the designer's body.

image

When Stefan Sagmeister wanted to announce that he was setting up his own studio in New York in 1994 he sent out a card featuring himself naked. Despite fears that it would lose him the only client he had at the time, the mailer had the opposite effect.

image

Now Sagmeister has made a major change in his business, with Jessica Walsh joining as a partner and the studio being renamed Sagmeister & Walsh. Time, then, to re-do that card, perhaps.

Sagmeister says he was "sheepish" about the idea of having both partners naked and initially suggested that Walsh could provide a contrast by being dressed ultra conservatively. Walsh, though, was having none of it: "Why should I be the conservative one?" she argued.

image

The result is an announcement in which both partners appear stark naked, save for, on Sagmeister's part, the addition of a pair of black socks, as in the original. It's a way of saying 'we're equal partners here' (Walsh is even posed on top of a pile of books to equalise their heights), both the same. Except they are not.

As a society, we view an image of a naked middle-aged man very differently to the way in which we react to a naked young woman. Logic dictates that we shouldn't, but we do.

A 50 year-old Sagmeister in his black socks is humorous and self-deprecatory as well as honest, open and daring. The original card suggested that here was a risk-taker who knew what it took to get himself, and by extension his clients, talked about. Will Walsh be judged as generously?

Comments

  • if she were older then yes I think it might be humorous and self-deprecatory. being so young, it comes off more sexual. And her body language in particular - legs crossed, arms crossed, hair covering top of her breasts, reads as being uncomfortable with being naked.
  • I think the hair is emphasise the fact she is a woman, long hair vs short. The arms crossed echo the earlier pics of him. The crossed legs I think might be practical. That's a narrow platform she is standing on.

    Or you are right. I'm seeing it both ways right now.

    As to her being judged like him, I think not. Society doesn't work that way.
  • you say that, lfm, but it was her choice.

    also, i think that 24 is young to be a partner, but not young to be naked :)
  • i think that maybe the pose is specifically to avoid a flash of vajayjay, which may render the ad far more risqué, and not useable in the way they'd originally intended.
  • yes I had those same thoughts - that need to 'tame' her nakedness in a way as to not be too risque, but there you go - a young fit naked pretty female is not the same as a middle age naked man, so I feel like if they were really going to stay true to the orginal risk-taking nature, that she should have been more confident in her pose and embraced being naked. I think I would have liked it if she were perched on a desk or chair - like this a bit: http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lpffo3tmls1qzahuvo1_500.jpg but with one leg tucked under her and no arms crossing in front of her, like this: http://www.michaelwestfield.com/michael/Photo-105-crop.jpg
  • edited June 2012
    that's a bit of a cheat - you have all your clothes on in that photo ;)

    yeah, possible. another way to look at it is that they are showing their vulnerability, rawness, and openness - something which sagmeister shows plenty of in his work. so maybe a little shyness isn't such a bad thing (plus, it makes her look far more real - remember that she is a design agency partner, not a porn star hehe).
  • the article talks about what will happen because of this, and makes a big thing out of what people will think of her now that she's done this. i think it will blow over in a day or so, and everyone will forget about it :D
Sign In or Register to comment.